Skip to content
BackGOD PLAYS DICE™Big questions, honest answers

THE QUESTION LIBRARY HOW WE KNOW

How much evidence should it take to change your mind?

How to change your confidence with evidence, understand Bayesian thinking, and use Occam’s razor without assuming the simplest story must be true.

THE SHORT ANSWER

There is no fixed amount. Change your confidence when evidence favors one explanation over its alternatives. A clue may justify a small shift; a strong test may justify a larger one. Bayesian thinking helps you make that comparison. Occam’s razor discourages unnecessary assumptions, but cannot guarantee the simplest answer is right.

  • Confidence can change gradually.
  • Compare evidence under competing explanations.
  • Simplicity cannot replace a good fit to observations.

WHAT WE DON’T KNOW YET

There is no agreed starting probability or decision threshold for every everyday claim. Missing alternatives, uncertain observations and assumptions can change the conclusion.

WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS ANSWER

For a particular belief, a checked observation that fits a competing explanation better, or a failed assumption behind the earlier judgment, would justify revision.

Changing your mind need not mean jumping from “definitely true” to “definitely false.” You can become less certain, prefer a different explanation, or say that you do not know yet. A useful question is: what would I expect to find if this claim were wrong?

Imagine your phone will not charge. A faulty cable and a damaged phone are two possibilities. If it charges with another cable but repeatedly fails with the original under the same conditions, the cable explanation gains support. One failed attempt alone tells you less.

THE LONG ANSWER

THE LONG ANSWER · ABOUT 2 MINUTES

You’ve read your 3 free long answers this month.

The short answer, how sure we are, what we don’t know, what would change our mind and every source stay free on every page, for everyone.

All Access members read the long answer: the evidence piece by piece, the strongest objections, and how to check it yourself.

Join All Access · $1 a week Or $6 a month

Billed $52 once a year. Cancel anytime in your account.

Until December 4, 11:59 pm Pacific: the Founding rate is $39 a year, and it stays $39 while you stay a member.

Create a free account: 6 long answers a month, email only.

Paying never buys a different answer. Our Paywall Promise

Words worth knowing (2)
Prior
A starting probability before considering new evidence.
Bayesian updating
Revising probabilities in light of evidence.

Sources & further reading

(3) · Checked Oct 5, 2026
  1. Bayes’ Theorem ↗Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyOfficial scholarly reference; sections 1–3 support the prior/evidence comparison. Checked October 5, 2026.
  2. Simplicity ↗Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyOfficial scholarly reference; sections 1–2 and 5 distinguish simplicity from evidential fit and discuss its disputed justification. Checked October 5, 2026.
  3. Bayesian Epistemology ↗Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyOfficial scholarly reference; sections 1.5,1.8–1.9 explain prior choice, updating disputes and idealization. Checked October 5, 2026.

See a mistake? Report a problem. Corrections are made openly.

The Architect AI companion · All Access

Your next question can go further.

Included with All Access →Up to 5 questions a day while available.

Put God Plays Dice on your Home Screen

On iPhone: tap Share (on iOS 26, tap ••• first), then Add to Home Screen, then Add.

On Android: In Chrome, you can also open the ⋮ menu and choose Add to Home screen or Install.

The Home Screen version keeps its own memory on iPhone, so your nights and saved answers start fresh there.

Search the Question Library

156 answers to read · 0 questions awaiting answers Your search runs on your device.

Answers about death, grief and crisis are always free, in full. If a question is personal right now →